Friday, May 15, 2009
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Come along to a free talk on the topic 'The Growth of Legislative Activity: Challenges & Implications', with:
The Hon. Justice Fraser
(Queensland Court of Appeal)
Mr Ian Davis
(Queensland Law Reform Commission)
Professor Suri Ratnapala
(TC Beirne School of Law)
Date: May 6th
Time: 6-7 pm
Location: Banco Court, Supreme Court Complex (George Street, Brisbane)
RSVP to firstname.lastname@example.org
Practitioners may claim 1 CPD point for attendance
Hope to see you all there!
Friday, February 27, 2009
- By submitting their essay to the ALPSA National Essay Competition (“the Competition”), entrants agree to be bound by the 2009 ALPSA National Essay Competition Rules (“the Rules”).
- The Competition closes Tuesday 31 March 2009 at 5pm Australian Eastern Standard Time (AEST) – for your information please visit http://www.australia.gov.au/Time, which explains AEST. Essays submitted late may or may not be considered, which decision is wholly at the discretion of ALPSA’s Executive.
- Entrants must submit their essays in Microsoft Word format by email to email@example.com. The email should detail the entrant’s full name, preferred email address, contact number, current university study (program of study and name of institution), postal address, and the word count of the essay.
- The essay must be written and submitted by a person currently enrolled in an undergraduate or postgraduate level program at an Australian university.
- Entrants may not submit essays which have previously been published or are currently being considered for publication, or essays which have previously won prizes or awards in academic competitions.
- Entrants may not submit more then one essay.
- The submitted essay must be between 2000 and 8000 words in length. Word count excludes footnotes, unless footnotes include substantive essay content.
- Entrants must be the original author of their submitted essay. All non-original material and sources must be referenced in accordance with general academic standards. Failure to reference or cite non-original material may be considered plagiarism. Entrants may use any generally accepted academic referencing standard, such as the Australian Guide to Legal Citation or Harvard Referencing. The Executive reserves the discretion to report instances of plagiarism to any affected or interested parties.
- Submitted essays will be shortlisted and judged according to the following criteria: Quality of legal philosophical discussion and argument, including knowledge and synthesis of information, innovation and articulation of argument, and structure of analysis; Academic quality, including choice and application of formatting and referencing style, clear and correct spelling and grammar.
- The 2009 ALPSA Executive (“the Executive”) will read all submitted essays and determine a shortlist. It is anticipated that entrants will be notified by email of which essays have been shortlisted.
- Shortlisted essays will be judged by the Honourable Justice PA Keane, Professor Wojciech Sadurski and Professor Emeritus Wilfrid Prest. It is anticipated that entrants will be notified by email or phone of which essays have placed first, second and third.
- First place will win $300, second place will win $150, and third place will win $50.
- Entrants give the Executive licence over the submitted essay as is reasonably necessary for the conduct of the Competition. This licence includes permission to make and distribute copies between members of the Executive and the Judges for short-listing and judging processes, reproducing entry details and excerpts in ALPSA publications, and keeping copies of submitted essays as archival records.
- The Executive may exclude an essay from the Competition for a breach of these rules or for conduct deemed contrary to the spirit of the Competition. At their discretion the Executive may notify an entrant by email or phone if their essay has been excluded from the Competition.
- All decisions of the judges and the ALPSA Executive are final. No appeals will be heard. The Competitions Convenor has discretion to vary the Competition Rules.
Sunday, February 1, 2009
If shortlisted your essay will be judged by an eminent and diverse panel consisting of the Honourable Justice PA Keane (Queensland Court of Appeal), Professor Wojciech Sadurski (Sydney Law School) and Professor Emeritus Wilfrid Prest (University of Adelaide Law School).
Instead of just gathering dust, your assignment could win 1st place and $300 of the cash prize money generously provided by the University of Queensland, whilst 2nd will receive $150 and 3rd $50.
Entries are open to undergraduates from around Australia, whether you are studying law, philosophy or international relations, to submit unpublished essays between 2000 and 8000 words long.
Please submit your paper by 5pm on Tuesday 31 March to firstname.lastname@example.org!
If you have any questions or need more information, please comment on this blog entry (as others may have a similar query), or email Michelle Delport (ALPSA Competitions Convenor) at email@example.com.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Nominations are invited from all interested parties; prior membership or involvement with ALPSA is not a requirement. The positions available are:
- Competition Convener
- Public Relations Officer
- Officer without portfolio
If there is more than one nomination for a position (excluding President, Treasurer or Secretary), the Meeting may allow two people to jointly hold the position.
We encourage all to get involved- anyone who is interested is more than welcome to play a role in ALPSA for 2009. Nominations should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org - simply include your name and a contact phone number, as well as which position you intend to stand for.
Nominations should be submitted as soon as possible, but may be made from the floor at the meeting. Please feel free to contact us at email@example.com if you have any questions or queries.
See you on Thursday!
The moot was based on the problem of the Speluncean Explorers written by Lon Fuller, and required teams to consider philosophical and jurisprudential issues. Judges from UQ, QUT and
Griffith put teams to the test, raising issues that ranged from questions of criminal procedure to the nature of the social contract.
Teams competed in three rounds of competition, and a team of UQ mooters comprising Chris Curtis, Michelle Delport and Edmund Robinson ultimately won the Grand Final, which was judged by the rather intimidating panel of Professor Ratnapala, Dr Crowe & Acting Judge John Devereaux SC.
Runners-up in the Final were Louise Young and Luke Gamble of QUT, with Louise winning the Best Speaker Prize for both the General Rounds and the Grand Final.
Thanks to all the teams that participated, as well as the following judges of the general rounds:
Associate Professor William MacNeil (Griffith University), Dr Nick James (UQ), Mark Thomas (QUT), Professor Jim Allan (UQ), Dr Francesca Bartlett (UQ) and Ryan Goss.